Alpha Recycling, Inc. v. Crosby re:



Alpha Recycling, Inc. sued Crosby for cybersquatting and defamation regarding and

In Alpha Recycling, Inc. v. Crosby, the defendant opposed summary judgment on two grounds: that the ALPHA mark was not distinctive, and that defendant lacked the requisite bad faith.

In the Alpha Recycling court opinion,


Alpha Recycling, Inc. v. Crosby

Plaintiff: Alpha Recycling, Inc.
Defendant: Timothy Crosby
Case Number: 1:2014cv05015
Filed: July 3, 2014
Court: New York Southern District Court
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Bronx
Presiding Judge: J. Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed # Document Text
March 23, 2016 68 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER: re: 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Cybersquatting and Defamation filed by Alpha Recycling, Inc.

  • For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
  • Summary judgment on liability is granted in favor of Plaintiff on its claim for cybersquatting.
  • Summary judgment is denied on Plaintiff’s claim for defamation.
  • The parties are directed to appear for a scheduling conference on April 1, 2016, at 3: 00 p.m. in Courtroom 706 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007.
  • The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at docket number 51.

SO ORDERED., ( Scheduling Conference set for 4/1/2016 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 706, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge J. Paul Oetken.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 3/23/2016) (ama)

About Author:

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *